48 Hours: Hard Evidence is a show broadcast on Discovery Times. Tonight I have become to disgusted with the set of events they have outlined for this show. Take not that there is another series called The First 48 Hours which is aired on A&E. Let me lay out a few basic points to this hour long show:
1) 3 boys were accused of gang raping another girl on July 5th.
2) This girl (Jane Doe) was not the one who turned them in.
3) The whole thing was video taped
4) She had already had sex with the three boys on seperate occasions the night prior to the alleged rape.
5) She voluntarily got naked in front of the boys asking them to have sex with her.
What really bothers me is they made a video and by the stupid grace of someone the kid left the tape at a friends and the friends parents found the tape and the ball started rolling from there into a full blown court case. Now while I was watching this video I noticed one kids name was Greg Heidel whose father is a deputy for San Bernadino? California, so I decided to google it thinking there would be plenty of other newspapers and press or atleast some press in some blog somewhere, but to my amazement I found nothing! I mean NOTHING. Well that right there is wierd enough for me to say hmmmm... an alleged gang rape but no news on it? Why not? Actually kind of baffling but I digress.
This Jane Doe girl is the one who made me the most livid. She as well as the parents of the accused make themselves out to be good people that would NEVER do anything like this and how appalled they are that this "gang rape" even happened. I myself was never in a 3some with 2 other dudes, but I have heard stories of peoples sexual romps and anyone who is willing to get naked and ask for 3 other people to have sex with them is hardly rape. Well part of her defense is that she was too drunk to consent. Well that may be the case, but in my experiences you don't cover yourself with honey and then wonder why a bear might have attacked you the next morning.... Anyways I will try a more coherent rant when I cool off....
Edit :
So the jury was 11 to 1 in favor of the boys on the account that in the video the girl was apparently consensual. The trial was a mistrial, but the problem is this one woman...notice "woman" who was convinced they did rape this girl. Now onto another fact:
The other jurors believed she was making motions and movements of acceptance(ie pulling the boys closer to her) that are consistent with someone who is NOT passed out or unconscious, but this "woman" decided that since she had(and I quote her her) "Her level of consciousness was not that of what I've ever seen of any normal sexual act.. ever." OK the first time I heard this I was like whaaa... and had to rewind and watch again to make sure I heard it right, but then there it was I did hear it right. So what I would like to know is how she has determined "normal sexual act" in her mind. Also she said "I've seen" so this is pulling from her own experiences! Now why in the world would she try to say that her reasoning for not going along with the rest of the jury would be because she herself was never witness(ie in person) to an event like this? Is she a porn star? NO so of course your views on sexual info is going to be limited coming into this case, but I don't think she needed to make that decision based on the fact that she's never "seen" anything like that happen before in a consentual manner, maybe I should send her some porn... ya think?
Look bottom line dont put yourself in the wrong place at the wrong time!
No one is a winner in this case, none of these people are innocent.. The boys ended up getting 6 years in jail when they got tried again, but here comes little miss Jane Doe again that got caught with what? Methamphetamines... that right people and if anyone knows someone who does meth they don't just stop, plus they are usually some of the biggest liars around. I will unfortunatly believe a rapist before I believe someone who is methed out... Anyways she is also suing them and a bunch of other people for 24MILLION dollars so she can go kill herself with a meth overdose. Don't say I didn't tell you.. told you so.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
You are a despicable human being. Here is the person you are talking about:
http://www.ocweekly.com/2012-04-26/news/jane-doe-greg-haidl-gang-rape/
BTW here is what you failed to grasp:
1. She was UNCONSCIOUS. It was originally treated as a potential homicide/necrophilia investigation because they thought the boys were having sex with a corpse.
2. She was violated with a pool cue, a snapple bottle, an apple juice can and a lit cigarette
3. She was so unconscious that she urinated in the middle of the assault, and was dropped on her head and didn't even flinch
4. Yeah, she did meth. After I was raped I did heroin. But she's now a college student studying criminal justice, a licensed victims rights advocate, and a much better person than you are.
Post a Comment